Gable Hall

Gable Hall #065942;Waupun Correctional Institution; PO Box 351; Waupun, Wi 53963

Gable Hall is asking for donations so he can clear his name. He was convicted of sexual assault and has served 10 years so far. He has evidence showing he was in Milwaukee County Jail at time of the crime, and he cites some 40 other violations done by the justice department in his case. He has a lawyer and needs between 3 and 5 thousand dollars to pay him. He will be filing for damages and will pay back donors (Three times donation) with winnings.(see contract at end)

Contents: 4 documents.
1) "Legal Reality in America"- here Mr Hall outlines the violations that occurred at his trial.
2) Newspaper article on huge lawsuit won in similar lawyer negligence case.
3) New evidence clearly shows that Hall was in Milwaukee County jail at time the crime was committed as well as some 40 other trial violations.
4) Plea for funds

1)LEGAL REALITY
IN FREE AMERICA
IF MR.HICKS RECEIVED $2MILLION FOR THE ONE SINGLE ISSUE, POSSIBLE INEFFECTIVE TRIAL COUNSEL, THEN BY LAW HALL IS GUARANTEED $50 MILLION OR MORE FOR SEVERAL FACTUAL ISSUES SUCH AS:( see newspaper article in next post)
(1). INEFFECTIVE OF TRIAL COUNSEL:
(2). POLICE MISCONDUCT:
(3). OBSTRUCTION OF JUSTICE:
(4). OVER (49) INCONSISTENCIES THROUGHOUT TRIAL TRANSCRIPTS:
(5). PERJURY ON PART OF SEVERAL STATE WITNESSES:
(6). THE STATE LEADING VICTIM TESTIMONY UNDER OATH:
(7). THE STATE COERCED ALLEGED VICTIM TO RECANT HALL WAS INNOCENT, TO HALL ALLEGEDLY GUILTY. YET UNDER CROSS EXAMINE ALLEGED VICTIM ONCE AGAIN RECANT BACK TO HALL WAS INNOCENT:
(8). TRIAL COUNSEL FAILED TO QUESTION ALLEGED VICTIM UNDER OATH REGARDING NUMEROUS CONTRADICTIONS SHE STATED BEFORE TRIAL, IN REGARDS TO HALL ALLEGED ACTIONS INSIDE HIS APT. UPON AN NON-EXISTING COUCH THREE DAYS AFTER OCT-26th 1995,EVEN THOUGH HALL WAS ALREADY WRONGFULLY CONFINED SINCE OCT-27th 1995:
(9)TRIAL COUNSEL FAILED TO SEEK CRUCIAL (DNA) TEST THAT WOULD HAVE EASILY EXONERATED HALL FROM THE ALLEGED CRIME:
(10)TRIAL COUNSEL FAILED TO PRESENT CRUCIAL EVIDENCE SHOWING HALL ON JOB (JOB SECURITY CAMERA) AT THE TIME THE ALLEGED CRIME ALLEGEDLY OCCURRED INSIDE HALLS APT. THREE DAYS AFTER OCT-26t-h 1995 THREE WEEKS AFTER ALLEGED VICTIM LEFT THE GROUP HOME OCT-7th 1995:
(11). TRIAL COUNSEL FAILED TO OBJECT TO TRIAL JUDGE AND THE STATE PROSECUTOR ENTERING JURY ROOM DURING SECOND DAY OF JURY DELIBERATION:
(12). TRIAL COUNSEL FAILED TO PURSUE TEN WITNESS WHO WOULD HAVE BOLSTERED HALLS CREDIBILITY, WHEN THE ENTIRE TRIAL WAS BASED SOLELY ON CREDIBILITY ALONE

A similar case as this is what Clark is hoping for
2)Attorney Must Pay Man 2.6 million
Associated Press
(State V Hicks, WIS 536 N W. 2nd 487 (WIS APP 1995)
Madison-- A jury has found attorney of a.man wrongly convicted of. rape should pay his client more than $2.6 million, because the lawyer did not seek crucial DNA tests .that might have exonerated the client.'
The "decision. Thursday against attorney Willie Nun­nery came in the case of Antho­ny Hicks, who spent 41/2 years in prison. Hicks claimed that during his 1991 trial, Nunnery neglected to seek DNA. tests on hair-root tis­sue, samples that might .have proved he did not commit the rape.
The lawsuit, heard before Dane County Circuit Judge Steven Ebert also alleged that Nunnery failed before the trial to pursue a witness who would have bolstered Hicks' alibi. The jury decided that Nun­nery was negligent on both counts and that Hicks might, have been found not guilty had Nunnery taken those steps. They awarded Hicks $2,606,950. Hicks' attorney, Jeff Scott Olson, had asked the jury for $2.5 million for lost wages and the pain and humiliation that Hicks suffered from the conviction.
"It's closure for myself and my family," Hicks : said mo­ments after the verdict. "It's now time to move forward." Nunnery and his lawyer, Robert Hase, left the courtroom after the verdict without comment.
Hicks was convicted of sexu­ally assaulting a woman in her Madison apartment on Nov. 15, 1990, and was sentenced to 19 years in prison. DNA evidence, taken from root tissue of hairs found at the crime scene even­tually won him freedom. .
Hase told the jury that Nun­nery should not have been ex­pected to know about the proce­dure to analyze DNA. taken from root tissue. Haze also ques­tioned whether the DNA evidence would have been strong enough to put reasonable doubt into the minds of jurors at Hicks' trial.

3)NEWLY DISCOVERED EXCULPATORY EVIDENCE
NEWLY DISCOVERED AND PREVIOUS EVIDENCE INDICATED ON TRIAL TRAN-94,37,35,90, suggesting that- the states case presented at trial, accused HALL of comm­itting the alleged crime while HALL was already confined in the Milwaukee county jail since oct-27th 1995,an inconceivable act.
Thus newly discovered exculpatory evidence demonstrate a reasonable probability that submission of the new exculpatory evidence at a new trial would secure a different result as required by, STATE V.DENNY,120 wis 2d 614 357 n.w. 2d 12 (ct app.1984).
BEST EVIDENCE shows the alleged victim first met HALL oct-lOth and not oct -255th, as alleged victim was coerced by the state to say. And that she allegedly moved into HALLS apt. on that same day oct-26th, which alleqedly took place THREE WEEKS after leaving group-home oct-7th 1995, as alleged victim was coerced by the state to say.
And that she allegedly resided inside HALLS apt.21/2 weeks in which the alleged assault allegedly occurred (THREE days) after allegedly moving into HALLS apt. oct-26th,as alleged victim was coerced by the state to sav. The newly discovered exculpatory evidence on trial transcript-94 , 37 , 35 , 90 , verify that, the states case presented at trial was LUDICROUS and made no common sense. And the fact that if HALL had a competent lawyer he would have had a reasonable chance, thus it need not be a 50-percent or greater chance.( MILLER V. ANDERSON, 255 f3d 455. 459 74th cir 2001) of being acquitted, given that guilt MUST be proved beyond a reasonable doubt.
With that said, there are three legal options HALL is rightfully entitled under the CONSTITUTION OF THE UNITED STATES DUE PROCESS LAW. (1)Either HALL is acquitted at retrial, thus would no doubt be a waste of tax payers hard earned dollars.
(2) Or HALL is simply PARDONED by the governor based on COMMON SENSE and EXCULPATORY EVIDENCE proving HALL was wronglv convicted due to false testimony under oath by several states witnesses.
(3)Or HALL is simply cleared after the state takes moral steps and admits their MISTAKE dismissing all charges against (HALL):
JUSTICE DELAYED IS JUSTICE DENIED. SO LET ME REMIND YOU OF THE DANGER INHERENT WHEN STATE OFFICIALS DECIDE TO PURSUE THEIR OWN POLICY PREFERENCE, RATHER THEN-BE GOVERNED BY THE RULE OF LAW


4) U.S. CONSTITUTIONAL
CALL FOR JUSTICE For Hall
-ENOUGH IS ENOUGH-
GABLE HALL, HAS OBTAIN A BRAVE ATTORNEY WHO'S NOT AFRAID TO GO UP AGAINST THE CORRUPT STATE OFFICIALS WHO KNOWINGLY USED FALSE TESTIMONY DURING TRIAL TO CONVICT HALL MORE THAN TEN-YEARS AGO, IN WHICH HALL IS STILL WRONGFULLY CONFINED TILL THIS DAY.
ANY AMOUNT OF DONATIONS IS NEEDED IN ORDER FOR HALL'S ATTY TO CONDUCT SWIFT CONSTITUTIONAL JUSTICE IN THIS CLEARLY UNJUST MATTER AT HAND.FOR EXAMPLE: AT TRIAL THE STATE ACCUSED HALL OF COMMITTING AN ALLEGED CRIME OCT-30,1995 WHILE HALL WAS ALREADY WRONGFULLY CONFINED IN THE MILWAUKEE COUNTY JAIL SINCE
OCT-27,1995. THIS WAS VERIFIED ON TRIAL TRANS-94,90,37,35.
ADD THAT RIDICULOUS ALLEGATION WITH THE OTHER #49 INCONSISTENCIES
THROUGHOUT HALLS TRIAL TRANSCRIPTS, AND YOU'LL GET #100% PROVEN
INNOCENT.
A SIMPLE $3,000 to $5,000 ATTY FEE IS ALL THAT NOW STAND BETWEEN
FREEDOM AND JUSTICE FOR HALL.
THEREFORE, WHATEVER GENEROUS DONATIONS YOU CAN CONTRIBUTE TO THIS U.S. CONSTITUTIONAL ,CALL FOR JUSTICE FOR HALL, YOU WILL BE REFUNDED THREE-TIMES THE DONATED AMOUNT ONCE MULTI-MILLION DOLLAR SETTLEMENT IS ACHIEVED GUARANTEED IN THE
INTEREST OF JUSTICE:

DONATIONS FOR LEGAL FEE SEND TO:
ATTY JOE CINCOTTA
2725 N. STOWELL
MILWAUKEE, WI 53211
DONATIONS FOR HALL'S PERSONAL NEEDS UNTIL RELEASED SEND TO:
WAUPUN CORR. INST.
C/0 GABLE HALL #065942
PO BOX 351
WAUPUN, WI 53963-0351
REFUND PLAN: (Three times donation)$10 REFUND $30 etc. $100 REFUND $300 etc. $5,000 REFUND $15,000 etc.
NOTE: ONCE AGAIN, HALLS WORD LEGALLY BIND HIM AND HIS ATTY TO THIS CONTRACT. ANY DONATIONS YOU MAY CONTRIBUTE LARGE OR SMALL WILL BE REFUNDED THREE-TIMES THE DONATED AMOUNT. IN ORDER TO BE REFUNDED ONCE SETTLEMENT IS ACHIEVED, HALL MUST RECEIVE PROOF OF EACH DONATION YOU CONTRIBUTE FOR HIS RECORDS. "THANK-YOU"!

We willl be collecting and putting documents on this site. For now, contact Gable Hall or FFUP fpr more information and/or verification. Forum for UInderstanding prisons; 29631 Wild Rose Drive; Blue River, wi 53518; swansol@mwt.net.